16 Repeatability of Contour Method Residual Stress Measurements for a Range of Material, Process, and Geometry 113 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge, with gratitude, the U.S. Air Force for providing financial support for this work (contract FA865014-C-5026). We would also like to acknowledge Steve McCracken from the Electric Power Research Institute for supplying and fabricating the stainless steel plate with a dissimilar metal slot-filled weld, Thomas Reynolds from Sandia National Laboratory for providing the stainless steel forgings, and Brian Streich from Honeywell for providing the nickel disk forgings. References 1. E11 Committee: Practice for use of the terms precision and bias in ASTM test methods. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2010) 2. Hill, M.R., Olson, M.D.: Repeatability of the contour method for residual stress measurement. Exp. Mech. 54(7), 1269–1277 (2014) 3. Olson, M.D., Hill, M.R., Willis, E, Peterson, A.G., Patel, V.I., Muránsky, O.: Assessment of weld residual stress measurement precision: Mockup design and results for the contour method. J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci. (2015) 4. SAE Aerospace: Aerospace material specification 4342: Aluminum alloy extrusions: Solution heat treated, stress relieved, s, and overaged. (2006) 5. Prime, M.B.: Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses by measuring the surface contour after a cut. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 123(2), 162–168 (2001) 6. Prime, M.B., DeWald, A.T.: The contour method. In: Schajer, G.S. (ed.) Practical Residual Stress Measurement Methods, Ch 5, pp. 109–138. Wiley, West Sussex (2013) 7. Wong, W., Hill, M.R.: Superposition and destructive residual stress measurements. Exp. Mech. 53(3), 339–344 (2013)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==