Shock & Vibration, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting, Acoustics & Optics, Volume 9

References 1. Kumar, M., Rao, T.N., Jagadisan, K., Rao, K.J.: Tailoring of Vibration Test Specifications for a Flight Vehicle. Research Centre Imarat, Hyderabad 2. Gatscher, J.A., Kawiecki, G.: Comparison of mechanical impedance methods for vibration simulation. Shock Vib. 3, 223–232 (1996) 3. Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests. Department of Defense Test Method Standard, MIL-STD-810G, 31 January 2008 4. Avitabile, P.: Why you can’t ignore those vibration fixture resonances. Sound Vib. (1999) 5. Piersol, A.G., White, P.H., Wilby, J.F., Hipol, P.J., Wilbey, E.G.: Vibration test procedures for orbiter sidewall-mounted payloads. Astron Research and Engineering Report 7114-01, November 1988 6. Force Limited Vibration Testing. NASA Technical Handbook, NASA-HDBK-7004C, Revision C, 30 November 2012 7. Scharton, T.D.: Force limited vibration testing monograph. NASA Reference Publication RP-1403, May 1997. 8. Daborn, P.M., Roberts, C., Ewins, D.J., Ind, P.R.: Next-generation random vibration tests. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, February 2014, Paper #92 9. Mayes, R.L.: A Craig-Bampton experimental dynamic substructure using the transmission simulator method. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, February 2015, Paper #353 10. Mayes, R.L.: A modal Craig-Bampton substructure for experiments, analysis, control and specifications. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, February 2015, Paper #352 11. Avitabile, P.: Review Finite Element Modeling. 22.515 Modal Analysis I Class Notes, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 19 June 2004 11 Quantification of Dynamic Differences Between Boundary Conditions for Environment Specification Improvement 131

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==