Fig. 3.2 Principle of the identification procedure using IGMU 13000 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 1 2 3 a b 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fig. 3.3 (a) Change of Young’s modulus at each iteration (blue) compared to the prescribed level (red) using IGMU; (b) Change of Poisson’s ratio at each iteration (blue) compared to the prescribed level (red) using IGMU 3 IGMU: A Geometrically Consistent Framework for Identification from Full Field Measurement 19
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==