Particle Filters and Auto-Encoders Combination for Damage Diagnosis on. . . 13 22. Fritzen, C.P., Mengelkamp, G., Guemes, A.: Elimination of temperature effects on damage detection within a smart structure concept. Struct. Heal. Monit. 10, 15–17 (2003) 23. Worden, K., Cross, E.J.: On switching response surface models, with applications to the structural health monitoring of bridges. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 98, 139–156 (2018) 24. Limongelli, M.: Frequency response function interpolation for damage detection under changing environment. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24(8), 2898–2913 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.03.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0888327010000658 25. Soo Lon Wah, W., Chen, Y.-T.: A new approach toward damage localization and quantification of structures under changing temperature condition. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Active Control (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348418793079 26. Abdessalem, A.B., Dervilis, N., Wagg, D., Worden, K.: Model selection and parameter estimation in structural dynamics using approximate Bayesian computation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 99, 306–325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.017. http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327017303321 27. Wan, C., Huang, R., Huang, L., Wen, B., Sato, T.: Damage identification using particle filters. Procedia Eng. 188, 41–47 (2017). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.455. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817320076. Structural Health Monitoring - From Sensing to Diagnosis and Prognosis 28. Chatzi, E., Smyth, A.: The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing. Struct. Control. Health Monit. 16, 99–123 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.290 29. Kwak, H.-G., Kim, S.-P., Kim, J.-E.: Nonlinear dynamic analysis of RC frames using cyclic moment curvature relation. Struct. Eng. Mech. 17(3-4), 357–378 (2004) 30. Loh, C.-H., Mao, C.H., Chao, S.-H., Weng, J.-H.: Feature extraction and system identification of reinforced concrete structures considering degrading hysteresis. Struct. Control. Health Monit. 17(7), 712–729 (2010) 31. Loh, C.-H., Mao, C.H., Huang, J.-R., Pan, T.-C.: System identification of degrading hysteresis of reinforced concrete frames. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40(6), 623–640 (2011) 32. Baber, T., Wen, Y.: Random vibration hysteretic, degrading systems. J .Eng. Mech. Div. 107(6), 1069–1087 (1981) 33. Yang, J.N., Xia, Y., Loh, C.-H.: Damage detection of hysteretic structures with a pinching effect. J. Eng. Mech. 140(3), 462–472 (2014) 34. Pathirage, C.S.N., Li, J., Li, L., Hao, H., Liu, W., Ni, P.: Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Eng. Struct. 172, 13–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0141029618302062 35. Yam, L., Yan, Y., Jiang, J.: Vibration-based damage detection for composite structures using wavelet transform and neural network identification. Compos. Struct. 60(4), 403–412 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00023-0. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0263822303000230 36. Sohn, H., Worden, K., Farrar, C.R.: Novelty detection using auto-associative neural network. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 1525–1532 (2001). www.scopus.com 37. Chang, C.M., Lin, T.K., Chang, C.W.: Applications of neural network models for structural health monitoring based on derived modal properties. Measurement 129, 457–470 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.051. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0263224118306559 38. Worden, K.: Structural fault detection using a novelty measure. J. Sound Vib. 201(1), 85–101 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0747. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022460X96907476 39. Chesne, S., Deraemaeker, A.: Damage localization using transmissibility functions: a critical review. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 38(2), 569– 584 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327013000745 40. Cheng, L., Cigada, A.: An analytical perspective about structural damage identification based on transmissibility function. Struct. Health Monit. 19(1), 142–155 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719838079 41. Rayleigh, J.W.S.B.: The Theory of Sound. Macmillan, New York (1896) 42. Cadini, F., Lomazzi, L., Ferrater Roca, M., Sbarufatti, C., Giglio, M.: Neutralization of temperature effects in damage diagnosis of MDOF systems by combinations of autoencoders and particle filters. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 162, 108048 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp. 2021.108048 43. Tulsyan, A., Gopaluni, B., Khare, S.: Particle filtering without tears: a primer for beginners. Comput. Chem. Eng. 95, 130–145 (2016). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.08.015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135416302769 44. Arulampalam, M.S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., Clapp, T.: A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50(2), 174–188 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/78.978374 45. Kramer, M.A.: Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AIChE J. 37(2), 233–243 (1991) 46. Harkat, M.F., Djelel, S., Doghmane, N., Benouaret, M.: Sensor fault detection, isolation and reconstruction using nonlinear principal component analysis. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 4(2), 149–155 (2007) 47. Luco, N.: Seismic design and hazard maps: before and after. In: Structure Magazine, pp. 28–30 (2019)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==