64 Y.-C. Zhu et al. References 1. Åström, K.J., Eykhoff, P.: System identification – a survey. Automatica. 7, 123–162 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(71)90059-8 2. Reynders, E.: System identification methods for (operational) modal analysis: review and comparison. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 19, 51– 124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9069-x 3. Chang, P.C., Flatau, A., Liu, S.C.: Review paper: health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct. Heal. Monit. 2, 257–267 (2003). https:// doi.org/10.1177/1475921703036169 4. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365, 303–315 (2007). https:/ /doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928 5. Brownjohn, J.M.W.: Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365, 589–622 (2007). https:// doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1925 6. Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hemez, F., Czarnecki, J.: A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996–2001. Third World Conf. Struct. Control. 1–7 (2002) 7. Salawu, O.S.: Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng. Struct. 19, 718–723 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0141-0296(96)00149-6 8. Brownjohn, J.M.W., Xia, P.-Q.: Dynamic assesment of curved cable-stayed bridge by model updating. J. Struct. Eng. (2000). https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(Asce)0733-9445(2000)126:2(252 9. Yin, T., Lam, H.F., Chow, H.M., Zhu, H.P.: Dynamic reduction-based structural damage detection of transmission tower utilizing ambient vibration data. Eng. Struct. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.004 10. Cox, R.T.: The Algebra of Probable Inference. Johns Hopkins Press Baltimore, Baltimore (1961) 11. Malakoff, D.: Bayes offers a “new” way to make sense of numbers. Science. 80, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5444.1460 12. Beck, J.L.: Bayesian system identification based on probability logic. Struct. Control Heal. Monit. 17, 825–847 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/ stc.424 13. Yuen, K.-V.: Bayesian Methods for Structural Dynamics and Civil Engineering. Wiley, New York (2010) 14. Wagg, D.J., Gardner, P., Barthorpe, R.J., Worden, K.: On key technologies for realising digital twins for structural dynamics applications. Conf. Proc. Soc. Exp. Mech. Ser. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_30 15. Worden, K., Cross, E.J., Gardner, P., Barthorpe, R.J., Wagg, D.J.: On digital twins, mirrors and virtualisations. Conf. Proc. Soc. Exp. Mech. Ser. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_34 16. Au, S.-K., Zhang, F.-L.: Fundamental two-stage formulation for Bayesian system identification, Part I: General theory. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.025 17. Beck, J.L., Katafygiotis, L.S.: Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J. Eng. Mech. 124, 455–461 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455 18. Cross, E.J., Koo, K.Y., Brownjohn, J.M.W., Worden, K.: Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 35, 16–34 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.08.026 19. Worden, K., Cross, E.J.: On switching response surface models, with applications to the structural health monitoring of bridges. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 98, 139–156 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.04.022 20. Ni, Y.Q., Zhou, H.F., Ko, J.M.: Generalization capability of neural network models for temperature-frequency correlation using monitoring data. J. Struct. Eng. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000050 21. Manson, G., Worden, K., Allman, D.: Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology. Part II. Novelty detection on a Gnat aircraft. J. Sound Vib. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5167 22. Worden, K., Manson, G., Allman, D.: Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part I. Novelty detection on a laboratory structure. J. Sound Vib. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5168 23. Blei, D.M., Kucukelbir, A., McAuliffe, J.D.: Variational inference: a review for statisticians. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01621459.2017.1285773 24. Wang, Z., Fu, Y., Yang, R.-J., Barbat, S., Chen, W.: Validating dynamic engineering models under uncertainty. J. Mech. Des. (2016). https:// doi.org/10.1115/1.4034089 25. Xu, H., Jiang, Z., Apley, D.W., Chen, W.: New metrics for validation of data-driven random process models in uncertainty quantification. J. Verif. Valid. Uncertain. Quantif. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031813 26. Oberkampf, W.L., Roy, C.J.: Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, New York (2011). https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760396 27. Au, S.-K., Zhang, F.-L., Ni, Y.-C.: Bayesian operational modal analysis: theory, computation, practice. Comput. Struct. 126, 3–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.015 Dr Yi-Chen Zhuis a research associate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Sheffield, focusing on the development of verification and validation techniques for digital twin models via Bayesian inference and machine learning techniques. His research also involves operational modal analysis in structural health monitoring
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==