346 M. Jerschl et al. 0 500 time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s time / s 1000 -10 -5 0 5 10 a b c displacement y1 q1 20 30 40 50 -5 0 5 displacement 750 760 770 780 790 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 displacement 0 500 1000 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 displacement 20 30 40 50 -10 -5 0 5 10 displacement 750 760 770 780 790 -2 -1 0 1 2 displacement 0 500 1000 -10 -5 0 5 10 velocity 20 30 40 50 -10 -5 0 5 10 velocity 750 760 770 780 790 -2 -1 0 1 2 velocity 0 500 1000 -20 -10 0 10 20 velocity 20 30 40 50 -10 -5 0 5 10 velocity 750 760 770 780 790 -2 -1 0 1 2 velocity zoom y1 q1 y1 q1 y2 q2 y2 q2 y2 q2 y1 q1 y2 q2 y2 q2 y2 q2 y1 q1 y1 q1 Fig. 33.4 Decay process initiated on isolated resonance withFH,tot D4.16N and excitation amplitude 1 N. Comparison between the numerically integrated solution and the modal solution. (a) whole decay process, (b) first zoom, (c) second zoom
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==