3 Validation of Strongly Coupled Models: A Framework for Resource Allocation 31 3. Atamturktur S, Williams B, Egeberg M, Unal C (2013) Batch sequential design of optimal experiments for improved predictive maturity in physics-based modeling. Struct Multidisc Optim 48(3):549–569 4. Bunya S, Dietrich JC, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave and storm surge model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi: Part I—model development and validation. Mon Weather Rev 138(2):345–377 5. Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA 6. Devore JL, Berk KN (2012) The analysis of variance. In: Modern mathematical statistics with applications. Springer, New York, pp 552–612 7. Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: Synoptic description and analysis of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mon Weather Rev 138:378–404 8. Draper D (1995) Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. J R Stat Soc 57:45–97 9. Egeberg M, Atamturktur S, Hemez F (2013) Defining coverage of a domain with validation experiments using a modified nearest-neighbor metric. Topics in model validation and uncertainty quantification. In: Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol 5, pp 113–122 10. Farajpour I, Atamturktur S (2012) Optimization-based strong coupling procedure for partitioned analysis. J Comput Civil Eng 26(5):648–660 11. Farajpour I, Atamturktur S (2013) Error and uncertainty analysis of inexact and imprecise computer models. J Comput Civil Eng 27(4):407–418 12. Farajpour I, Atamturktur S (2014) Partitioned analysis of coupled numerical models considering imprecise parameters and inexact models. J Comput Civil Eng 28(1):145–155 13. Farajpour I, Atamturktur S (2014) Role of numerical errors in the strongly coupled models. In: IMAC XXXII A conference and exposition on structural dynamics, Rosen Plaza Hotel, Orlando, FL, 3–6 Feb 2014 14. Felippa CA, Park KC, Farhat C (2001) Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3247–3270 15. Fernandez MA, Moubachir M (2005) A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid–structure coupling. Comput Struct 83:127–142 16. Gates WL, Han Y, Schlesinger ME (1985) Chapter 11: the global climate simulated by a coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model: preliminary results. Elsevier Oceanogr Ser 40:131–151 17. Hegenderfer J, Atamturktur S (2013) Prioritization of code development efforts in partitioned analysis. Comput-Aided Civ Inf Eng 28(4):289–306 18. Heil M (2004) An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1–23 19. Hemez F, Atamturktur S, Unal C (2010) Defining predictive maturity for validated numerical simulations. Comput Struct J 88:497–505 20. Higdon D, Nakhleh C, Gattiker J, Williams B (2008) A Bayesian calibration approach to the thermal problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(29–32):2431–2441 21. Janke SJ, Tinsley F (2005) Introduction to linear models and statistical inference. Wiley, New York 22. Joosten MM, Dettmer WG, Peric D (2009) Analysis of the block Gauss–Seidel solution procedure for a strongly coupled model problem with reference to fluid–structure interaction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78:757–778 23. Keener JP (1987) Causes of propagation failure in excitable media. temporal disorder. In: Rensing L, an der Heiden U, Mackey MC (eds) Human oscillatory systems, vol 36. Springer, Berlin, pp 134–140 24. Kennedy M, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B 68:425–464 25. Lam CQ, Notz WI (2008) Sequential adaptive designs in computer experiments for response surface model fit. Stat Appl 6:207–233 26. Larson J, Jacob R, Ong E (2005) The Model Coupling Toolkit: a new Fortran90 toolkit for building multi-physics parallel coupled models. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 19(3):277–292 27. Latif M, Stockdale T, Wolff J, Burgers G, Maier-Reimer E, Junge MM, Arpe K, Bengtsson L (1994) Climatology and variability in the ECHO coupled GCM. Tellus 46(4):351–366 28. Leiva JS, Blanco PJ, Buscaglia GC (2010) Iterative strong coupling of dimensionally heterogeneous models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(12):1558–1580 29. Loeppky JL, Moore LM, Williams BJ (2010) Batch sequential designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 140(6):1452–1464 30. Magazinius J, Russo A, Sabelfeld A (2012) On-the-fly inlining of dynamic security monitors. Comput Secur 31(7):827–843 31. Matthies HG, Steindorf J (2002) Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid–structure interaction. Comput Struct 80:1991–1999 32. Matthies HG, Niekamp R, Steindorf J (2006) Algorithms for strong coupling procedures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2028–2049 33. Mollineaux M, Van Buren K, Hemez F, Atamturktur S (2012) Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: Part I, Model development and verification. Wind Energy 16(5):694–710 34. Myers RH, Khuri AI, Carter WH (1989) Response surface methodology: 1966–l988. Technometrics 31(2):137–157 35. Rugonyi S, Bathe KJ (2001) On finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions. Comput Model Eng Sci 2(2):195–212 36. Sacks J, Schiller SB (1988) Spatial designs. In: Gupta SS, Berger JO (eds) Statistical decision theory and related topics IV, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 385–399 37. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Designs and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409–435 38. Shewry MC, Wynn HP (1987) Maximum entropy sampling. J Appl Stat 14:898–914 39. Stevens G, Atamturktur S, Hegenderfer J (2014) Improving model predictions through partitioned analysis: a combined experimental and numerical analysis. In: Proceedings of 32th Society of Experimental Mechanics (SEM) International Modal Analysis Conference (IMACXXXII), Orlando, FL 40. Stevens G, Atamturktur S, Lebensohn RA, Kaschner GC (2014) Experiment-based validation of coupled multi-scale plasticity models. In: Proceedings of 32th Society of Experimental Mechanics (SEM) International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC-XXXII), Orlando, FL 41. Thacker BH, Doebling SW, Hemez FM, Anderson MC, Pepin JE, Rodriguez EA (2004) Concepts of model verification and validation. Los Alamos National Laboratories, Los Alamos, NM, LA-14167-MS. doi: 10.2172/835920
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==