402 M.K. Vakilzadeh et al. 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Model order Flapwise Error Baseline model Beam model 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Model order Edgewise Error Baseline model Beam model b a Fig. 37.9 The relative approximation error (%) of the baseline FE and beam model for different model orders. The model is simultaneously excited in both the flapwise and edgewise direction using the designed multisine signal. The output is measured in (a) flapwise and (b) edgewise directions References 1. Yang B, Sun D (2013) Testing, inspecting and monitoring technologies for wind turbine blades: a survey. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 22:515–526 2. Mollineaux MG, Van Buren KL, Hemez FM, Atamturktur S (2013) Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: part I, model development and verification. Wind Energy 16(5):694–710 3. Van Buren KL, Mollineaux MG, Hemez FM, Atamturktur S (2013) Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: part II, model validation and uncertainty quantification. Wind Energy 16(5):741–758 4. Bottasso CL, Cacciola S, Croce A (2013) Estimation of blade structural properties from experimental data. Wind Energy 16(4):501–518 5. Cárdenas D, Escárpita AA, Elizalde H, Aguirre JJ, Ahuett H, Marzocca P, Probst O (2012) Numerical validation of a finite element thin-walled beam model of a composite wind turbine blade. Wind Energy 15(2):203–223 6. Antoulas AC (2005) Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia 7. Kerschen G, Golinval JC, Vakakis AF, Bergman LA (2005) The method of proper orthogonal decomposition for dynamical characterization and order reduction of mechanical systems: an overview. Nonlinear Dyn 41(1–3):147–169 8. Vakilzadeh MK, Rahrovani S, Abrahamsson T (2013) Modal reduction based on accurate input–output relation preservation, IMAC XXXI, Orange County, CA 45:333–342 9. Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G (2007) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden 10. Abrahamsson TJS, Kammer DC (2014) FEM calibration with FRF damping equalization. In: IMAC XXXII, Orlando 11. Pintelon R, Schoukens J (2012) System identification: a frequency domain approach, 2nd edn. Wiley-IEEE Press, New Jersey 12. Friswell MI (1990) Candidate reduced order models for structural parameter estimation. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliability Des 112(1):93–97 13. Kammer D (1996) Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods, J Guid Control Dyn 19(3):729–731 14. Carrera E, Giunta G, Nali P, Petrolo M (2010) Refined beam elements with arbitrary cross-section geometries. Comput Struct 88(5–6):283–293
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==