For sensor configuration A, the output response at locations other than top right corner were also collected and compared with expanded results. Note however that the measurements used for comparison purposes were not included in expansion process. The output response comparison plots are shown in Figure 9 at five such locations. Notice that at all locations the TRAC correlation values are 99.9+% which indicates an excellent correlation of expanded data with measurements for the time period shown. Figure 9: Overlay of the Displacement Responses from Predicted Solution Using First Five Modes for Expansion and PONTOS at Five Different Locations; expansion performed using sensor configuration A With the sensor configuration B, the output response at locations other than location 4 were also collected and compared with the expanded results. Again the measurements used for comparison purposes were not included in the expansion process. The output response comparison plots are shown in Figure 10 at five such locations. Notice that at all but one location the TRAC correlation values are 99.9+% which indicates a very good correlation of expanded data with measurements for the time period shown. This confirms that even with 7 sensors, accurate prediction of response is possible using proposed methodology for up 3112 locations. 210
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==