REFERENCES 1 Otte, D., “Development and Evaluation of Singular Value Analysis Methodologies for Studying Multivariate Noise and Vibration Problems”, Doctorate Dissertation, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, May 1994. 2 Ren, Y., Beards, C., “On Substructure Synthesis with FRF Data”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 185, No. 5, pp. 845-866, Sept 1995. 3 Piergentili, F., “Rotational Degree of Freedom Estimation of Frequency Response Functions for Substructured Experimental Components”, Master’s Thesis, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Aug 1999. 4 Cuppas, K., Sas, P., Hermans, L., “Evaluation of the FRF Based Substructuring and Modal Synthesis Technique Applied to Vehicle FE Data”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Seminar on Modal Analysis, Leuven, Belgium, Sept 2000. 5 De Klerk, D., Rixen, D., Voormeeren, S., Pasteuning, F., “Solving the RDoF Problem in Experimental Dynamic Substructuring”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Florida, Feb. 2008. 6 Nicgorski, D., Avitabile, P., “Conditioning of FRF Measurements for use with Frequency Based Substructuring”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Florida, Feb. 2009. 7 D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A., “Decoupling of a Substructure from Modal Data of the Complete Structure”, Proceedings of ISMA 2008 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium, Sept 2004.. 8 D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A., “Prediction of Substructure Properties using Decoupling Procedures”, Proceedings of EURODYN 2005 – Sixth European Conference on Structural Dynamics, Paris, France, Sept 2005.. 9 D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A., “Promises and Pitfalls of Decoupling Procedures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Florida, Feb 2008. 10 D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A., “Sensitivity of Decoupling Techniques to Uncertainties in the Properties”, Proceedings of ISMA 2008 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium, Sept 2008. 11 D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A., “Decoupling Procedures in the General Framework of Frequency Based Substructuring”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Florida, Feb 2009. 12 Gray, S., Starkey, J., “Dynamic Substructure Separation Using Physical and Modal Models”, Proceedings of the Sixth International Modal Analysis Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, Feb 1988. 13 Sjövall, P., Abrahamsson, T., “Substructure System Identification from Coupled System Test Data”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 15-33, Jan 2008. 14 Voormeeren, S., Rixen, D., “Substructure Decoupling Techniques – a Review and Uncertainty Propagation Analysis”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Florida, Feb 2009. 15 Zhen, J., Lim, T., Lu, G., “Determination of System Vibratory Response Characteristics Applying a Spectral-Based Inverse Sub-Structuring Approach. Part I: Analytical Formulation”, International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, pp. 1-30, 2004. 16 Zhen, J., Lim, T., Lu, G., “Determination of System Vibratory Response Characteristics Applying a Spectral-Based Inverse Sub-Structuring Approach. Part II: Motor Vehicle Structures”, International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, pp. 31-67, 2004. 17 Cloutier, D., “Investigation of Various System Model Decoupling Techniques”, Master’s Thesis, University of Massachusetts Lowell, May 2010 18 MATLAB R2009b, The MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts. 19 LMS Test.Lab 9b, Leuven Measurement Systems, Leuven, Belgium. 20 FEMtools 3.1, Dynamic Design Solutions, Leuven, Belgium 185
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==