Smoothing experimental data in dynamic substructuring of built up systems duce inconsistencies. In fact, by removing such modes during curve fitting, better results are observed. Results can be badly affected by inaccurate measurements. Non collocated approach allows to discard the least accurate measurements thus improving the result. Acknowledgements This research is supported by grants from University of Rome La Sapienza. References 1. D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A.: Prediction of substructure properties using decoupling procedures. Structural Dynamics - Eurodyn 2005, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, pp. 1893–1898. Paris (France) (2005) 2. D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A.: Promises and pitfalls of decoupling procedures. In: Proceeding of 26th IMAC. Orlando (U.S.A.) (2008) 3. D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A.: Decoupling procedures in the general framework of frequency based substructuring. In: Proceedings of 27th IMAC. Orlando (U.S.A.) (2009) 4. D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A.: The role of interface dofs in decoupling of substructures based on the dual domain decomposition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 24(7), 2035–2048 (2010). Doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.05.007, also in Proceedings of ISMA 2010, pp. 1863-1880, Leuven (Belgium) 5. D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A.: Direct decoupling of substructures using primal and dual formulation. In: Proceedings of 29th IMAC. Jacksonville (U.S.A.) (2011) 6. D’Ambrogio, W., Sestieri, A.: A unified approach to substructuring and structural modification problems. Shock and Vibration11(3-4), 295–310 (2004) 7. Ind, P., Ewins, D.: Impedance based decoupling and its application to indirect modal testing and component measurement: a numerical investigation. In: Proceedings of 21st IMAC, p. 9. Kissimmee (USA) (2003) 8. Jetmundsen, B., Bielawa, R., Flannelly, W.: Generalised frequency domain substructure synthesis. Journal of the American Helicopter Society33(1), 55–64 (1988) 9. Kalling, P., Abrahamsson, T., McKelvey, T.: Subsystem state-space model identification and its sensitivity to test variability. In: P. Sas, M. De Munck (eds.) Proceedings of ISMA 2004 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, pp. 2729–2744. Leuven (Belgium) (2004) 10. de Klerk, D.: Dynamic response characterization of complex systems through operational identification and dynamic substructuring. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft (2009) 11. de Klerk, D., Rixen, D.J., de Jong, J.: The frequency based substructuring (FBS) method reformulated according to the dual domain decomposition method. In: Proceeding of 24th IMAC. St. Louis, Missouri (U.S.A.) (2006) 12. de Klerk, D., Rixen, D.J., Voormeeren, S.: General framework for dynamic substructuring: History, review, and classification of techniques. AIAA Journal 46(5), 1169–1181 (2008) 13. Mayes, R.L., Arviso, M.: Design studies for the transmission simulator method of experimental dynamic substructuring. In: P. Sas, B. Bergen (eds.) Proceedings of ISMA 2010 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, pp. 1929–1938. Leuven (Belgium) (2010) 14. Nicgorski, D., Avitabile, P.: Experimental issues related to frequency response function measurements for frequency-based substructuring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 24(5), 1324–1337 (2010). Doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.006 15. Sjo˜vall, P., Abrahamsson, T.: Substructure system identification from coupled system test data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing22(1), 15–33 (2008) 16. Vormeeren, S.N., Rixen, D.J.: A dual approach to substructure decoupling techniques. In: Proceeding of 28th IMAC. Jacksonville (U.S.A.) (2010) 109
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTMzNzEzMQ==